Skip to content

Outage tracker / Codecov

Is Codecov down?

I'm having a problem

Operationalchecked 21 minutes ago

We reached Codecov from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 5, 2026, 7:54 PM UTC, Codecov answered RealUptime's probes in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Functional endpoints verified

Last outage: 8h 47m on Oct 5, 2026 (API, from Europe, South America, US-East, UK, Asia-Pacific, US-Central, Southeast Asia, US-West, Australia and Canada).

Codecov's own status page reports "Partially Degraded Service." That is their claim, not our measurement: our probes are currently reaching Codecov, and an incident they declare can affect parts of the service our checks do not exercise. We show both and never merge them.

our independent probeslive · checked Oct 5, 2026, 7:54 PM UTC
US-East182 msOperational
US-West370 msOperational
Europe300 msOperational
Asia-Pacific415 msOperational
US-Central257 msOperational
Canada180 msOperational
UK152 msOperational
Southeast Asia435 msOperational
Australia465 msOperational
South America574 msOperational
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Codecov reports: Minor incident (“Partially Degraded Service”)

from Codecov's own status page, checked Oct 5, 2026, 7:52 PM UTC
Codecov's status page reports Partially Degraded Service. Our probes are currently reaching Codecov successfully with normal latency. RealUptime's independent checks are currently succeeding from all 10 regions. These observations can coexist: a partial error-rate degradation on their side does not have to affect every request. Our checks measure whether a single request succeeds, not the vendor's internal error rate, so this can happen when an issue affects only part of a service that our simple check does not exercise. We show what we measured, not what they report: differences can mean a partial or user-specific issue that a simple reachability check won't catch. Read both before you draw a conclusion.

Codecov's own component breakdown, as they publish it

  • Atlassian Bitbucket APIOperational
  • Codecov FrontendOperational
  • GitHub ActionsDegraded performance
  • Google Cloud Platform SQLOperational
  • Atlassian Bitbucket PipelinesOperational
  • Codecov BackendOperational
  • GitHub API RequestsOperational
  • Google Cloud Platform Kubernetes EngineOperational
  • Atlassian Bitbucket WebhooksOperational
  • GitHub Git OperationsOperational
  • Google Cloud Platform Cloud StorageOperational
  • Google Cloud Platform Google Container EngineOperational
  • Google Cloud Platform Google Compute EngineOperational
  • GitHub Pull RequestsOperational
  • GitLabOperational
  • Codecov Billing (Stripe API)Operational
  • GitHub WebhooksOperational
  • Codecov Docs (hosted by ReadMe)Operational

These are Codecov's components, named and scored by Codecov. We do not map them onto the functions we check above, because we have no way to know which of their components our checks touch. Two lists, side by side, neither one rewriting the other.

This is Codecov's own claim about their service, shown separately from what we measured. We never change our own numbers based on what a vendor reports, and this reading never changes theirs. Read both.

Codecov response time, by region

US-East
272msp95 · latest
500ms250ms0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 500ms. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 389ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 412ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 402ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 423ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 436ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 366ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 264ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 235ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 288ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 319ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 350ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 249ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 306ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 281ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 266ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 261ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 284ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 280ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 262ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 296ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 278ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 277ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 276ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 265ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 249ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 311ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 303ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 298ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 262ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 272ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-West
503msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 450ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 451ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 503ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 463ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 514ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 584ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 472ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 473ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 466ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 504ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 577ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 479ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 450ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 425ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 430ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 429ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 464ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 465ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 440ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 454ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 447ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 463ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 473ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 422ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 431ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 449ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 486ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 514ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 503ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Europe
346msp95 · latest
500ms250ms0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 500ms. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 341ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 352ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 340ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 355ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 342ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 353ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 383ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 380ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 327ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 350ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 446ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 364ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 340ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 341ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 346ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 342ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 350ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 352ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 375ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 357ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 385ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 329ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 338ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 418ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 384ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 349ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 384ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 346ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Asia-Pacific
526msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 776ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 918ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 833ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 858ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 854ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 621ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 627ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 827ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 507ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 534ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 550ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 447ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 433ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 433ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 432ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 428ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 498ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 445ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 663ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 440ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 438ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 412ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 531ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 472ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 490ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 639ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 511ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 439ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 458ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 526ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-Central
296msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 448ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 556ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 595ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 560ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 542ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 343ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 348ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 415ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 455ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 562ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 354ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 379ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 365ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 435ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 329ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 333ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 401ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 374ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 388ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 344ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 388ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 431ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 368ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 401ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 295ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 390ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 381ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 392ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 296ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Canada
333msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 444ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 465ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 491ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 456ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 435ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 328ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 314ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 390ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 356ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 305ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 369ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 424ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 366ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 380ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 341ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 347ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 373ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 313ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 327ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 392ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 387ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 331ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 339ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 395ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 321ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 363ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 408ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 333ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
UK
192msp95 · latest
500ms250ms0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 500ms. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 195ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 212ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 230ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 224ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 230ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 213ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 240ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 231ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 223ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 486ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 236ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 210ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 211ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 212ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 215ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 225ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 219ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 206ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 227ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 296ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 217ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 296ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 208ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 223ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 300ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 354ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 218ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 217ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 192ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Southeast Asia
477msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 860ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 929ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 950ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 923ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 885ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 761ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 572ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 501ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 483ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 487ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 802ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 556ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 454ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 443ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 442ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 518ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 492ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 443ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 457ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 466ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 462ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 497ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 534ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 530ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 455ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 489ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 473ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 477ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 477ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Australia
668msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 612ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 674ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 665ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 696ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 716ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 705ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 719ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 690ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 741ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 739ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 679ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 756ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 657ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 662ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 641ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 732ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 661ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 633ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 686ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 644ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 663ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 787ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 656ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 610ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 623ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 846ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 612ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 654ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 617ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 668ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
South America
586msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 546ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 556ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 880ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 748ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 717ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 613ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 494ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 543ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 542ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 650ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 766ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 636ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 547ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 549ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 586ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 542ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 697ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 599ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 584ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 679ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 665ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 659ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 753ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 590ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 575ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 562ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 589ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 659ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 586ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5

Is it Codecov, or is it you?

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Codecov -- it cannot diagnose Codecov's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Codecov answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the api row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
  • APIprimaryUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational

Get an email when we see Codecov go down, and when it is back

Get told when we measure this

We will tell you when our probes stop reaching Codecov, and again when they can reach it again. That is our own measurement from ten regions, not Codecov's status page. No account, no card.

Delivery channel

Double opt-in: nothing is sent until you click the link in the confirmation email. One email when a measured outage opens, one when it closes, and a one-click unsubscribe in every one. We do not send anything else to this address.

What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What we measured, and what people reported

  • North America
    OperationalUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Operationallatency: 182msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:54 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Operationallatency: 370msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:53 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Operationallatency: 257msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Operationallatency: 180msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:24 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Operationallatency: 574msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    OperationalEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Operationallatency: 300msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:53 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Operationallatency: 152msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    OperationalAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Operationallatency: 415msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:54 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Operationallatency: 435msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Operationallatency: 465msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Codecov normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Codecov, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for Codecov yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent outages

Codecov app and services are down, 2h 23mdeclared on their status page2026-10-05
Outage, 8h 47mmeasured by our probes · Europe and South America and US-East and UK and Asia-Pacific and US-Central and Southeast Asia and US-West and Australia and Canada2026-10-05
Degraded performance on report processing, 50mdeclared on their status page2026-08-13
PR Notifications delayed, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-07-26
Upload processing is severely delayed, 5h 58mdeclared on their status page2026-07-22
Codecov services partially impacted and causing slowdowns, 12h 47mdeclared on their status page2026-07-16
Degraded processing service, 6h 55mdeclared on their status page2026-07-15
Codecov UI showing 400 Bad Request, 3h 3mdeclared on their status page2026-07-08

measured entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Codecov since August 22, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Codecov covering any window you pick, with our measurements and Codecov's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full availability history for Codecov: 90-day availability by region, month-by-month uptime, and every incident on record.

Monitor your own site the same way

This page shows what we see when we check this service, using the same ten regions, for a site you run. RealUptime Monitor watches your own servers from inside your network, and it starts free.

Start monitoring your own servers

Put this badge in your README

Codecov uptime measured by RealUptimeLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Codecov uptime measured by RealUptime](https://realuptime.io/outages/codecov/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/codecov)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/codecov"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/codecov/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Codecov uptime measured by RealUptime"></a>

The badge shows the share of our probes that succeeded over the last 30 days, and the window is printed on it so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so: it will not show green on data we cannot vouch for. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

What Codecov's SLA implies, from our measurement

Below your target

We measured 8h 47m of downtime for Codecov over the last 30 days, which is 98.7795% uptime by our reading. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

That is 8h 4m more than the target allows. The figure above is the pro-rata share of one month's fee for the time we could not reach it. Your contract probably uses a tiered credit schedule instead, and we have not read it, so treat this as one common way to reason about a credit rather than the amount they owe.

This is computed from our own probe measurements, not from Codecov's SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primaryfunctional: live API
https://api.codecov.io/api/v2/github/codecov
secondary
https://about.codecov.io/
secondary
https://status.codecov.com/api/v2/status.json
RealUptime is not affiliated with Codecov; the name identifies what we measured, and nothing here speaks for Codecov's own team. We send a single web request to Codecov from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Codecov's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Codecov's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Codecov is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a clean read there is a stronger signal than reachability alone, though it still does not cover every feature of the service. Read the full methodology.