Skip to content

Outage tracker / Vercel

Is Vercel down?

I'm having a problem

Operationalchecked 1 minute ago

We reached Vercel from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 5, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC, Vercel answered RealUptime's probes in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Functional endpoints verified

Last outage: 10 min on Sep 11, 2026 (web surface, from US-West).

our independent probeslive · checked Oct 5, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC
US-East316 msOperational
US-West39 msOperational
Europe483 msOperational
Asia-Pacific662 msOperational
US-Central366 msOperational
Canada222 msOperational
UK466 msOperational
Southeast Asia712 msOperational
Australia776 msOperational
South America624 msOperational
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Vercel reports: All systems operational (“All Systems Operational”)

from Vercel's own status page, checked Oct 5, 2026, 7:52 PM UTC
Our probes and Vercel's own status page agree: both show Vercel as reachable right now.

Vercel's own component breakdown, as they publish it

  • AI GatewayOperational
  • ARN1 - Stockholm, SwedenOperational
  • BlobOperational
  • BuildsOperational
  • BuildsOperational
  • DashboardOperational
  • DrainsOperational
  • Output GenerationOperational
  • APIOperational
  • BOM1 - Mumbai, IndiaOperational
  • DashboardOperational
  • Global ConfigOperational
  • LogsOperational
  • Support CenterOperational
  • npm RegistryOperational
  • CDG1 - Paris, France, EuropeOperational
  • Deploy HooksOperational
  • ObservabilityOperational
  • Support ChatOperational
  • CLE1 - Cleveland, East USOperational
  • Git IntegrationsOperational
  • Speed InsightsOperational
  • CPT1 - Cape Town, South AfricaOperational
  • Web AnalyticsOperational
  • CommunityOperational
  • DUB1 - Dublin, IrelandOperational
  • Cron JobsOperational
  • DXB1 - Dubai, UAEOperational
  • Integration WebhooksOperational
  • FRA1 - Frankfurt, Germany, EuropeOperational
  • Data CacheOperational
  • GRU1 - São Paulo, BrazilOperational
  • DNSOperational
  • HKG1 - Hong KongOperational
  • Domain RegistrationOperational
  • HND1 - Tokyo, JapanOperational
  • FirewallOperational
  • IAD1 - Washington DC, USAOperational
  • FunctionsOperational
  • ICN1 - Seoul, South KoreaOperational
  • Image OptimizationOperational
  • KIX1 - Osaka, JapanOperational
  • LHR1 - London, UKOperational
  • PDX1 - Portland, West USOperational
  • MarketplaceOperational
  • SFO1 - San Francisco, CA, USAOperational
  • QueuesOperational
  • SIN1 - SingaporeOperational
  • Remote CachingOperational
  • SYD1 - Sydney, AustraliaOperational
  • Routing MiddlewareOperational
  • YUL1 - Montréal, CanadaOperational
  • SAML Single Sign-OnOperational
  • SandboxOperational
  • TLS CertificatesOperational
  • WorkflowOperational
  • Container RegistryOperational
  • Key Management ServiceOperational
  • ConnectOperational

These are Vercel's components, named and scored by Vercel. We do not map them onto the functions we check above, because we have no way to know which of their components our checks touch. Two lists, side by side, neither one rewriting the other.

This is Vercel's own claim about their service, shown separately from what we measured. We never change our own numbers based on what a vendor reports, and this reading never changes theirs. Read both.

Vercel response time, by region

US-East
406msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 385ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 363ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 379ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 381ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 445ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 535ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 444ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 389ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 544ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 566ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 641ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 512ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 408ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 546ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 521ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 534ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 567ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 802ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 777ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 503ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 518ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 488ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 581ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 536ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 530ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 605ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 589ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 601ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 416ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 406ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-West
226msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 427ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 441ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 319ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 180ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 146ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 244ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 180ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 145ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 157ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 280ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 263ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 251ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 298ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 482ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 399ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 329ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 646ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 581ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 264ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 311ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 292ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 334ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 220ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 385ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 609ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 566ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 453ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 371ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 260ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 226ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Europe
658msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 644ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 648ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 699ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 665ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 645ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 611ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 617ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 618ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 605ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 642ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 636ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 660ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 867ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 988ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 740ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 628ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 642ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 604ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 629ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 668ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 671ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 720ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 706ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 659ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 658ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Asia-Pacific
748msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 820ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 853ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 938ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 926ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 844ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 804ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 743ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 662ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 742ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 751ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 886ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 840ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 812ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 866ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 878ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 897ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 939ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 866ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 801ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 829ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 752ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 734ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 880ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 828ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 777ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 921ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 765ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 795ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 730ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 748ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-Central
356msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 707ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 383ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 471ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 424ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 777ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 983ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 972ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 977ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 519ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 504ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 320ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 363ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 311ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 201ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 196ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 818ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 854ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 792ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 474ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 673ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 629ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 544ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 496ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 569ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 356ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Canada
399msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 462ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 512ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 542ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 526ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 457ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 338ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 364ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 352ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 450ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 473ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 399ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 409ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 650ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 528ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 434ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 465ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 557ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 547ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 476ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 504ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 579ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 570ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 426ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 448ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 398ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 356ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 418ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 466ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 399ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
UK
570msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 569ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 578ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 615ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 597ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 696ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 728ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 605ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 603ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 579ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 642ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 618ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 747ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 737ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 823ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 668ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 769ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 754ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 808ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 983ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 862ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 983ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 825ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 927ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 821ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 768ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 709ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 735ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 686ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 570ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Southeast Asia
925msp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 978ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 914ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 879ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 895ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 902ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 914ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 941ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 905ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 876ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 925ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Australia
1.3sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 933ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 994ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 913ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 756ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 782ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 770ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 937ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 795ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 873ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 784ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 831ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 873ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 838ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 907ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 808ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 865ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 731ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 741ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 774ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 774ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.3s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
South America
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 898ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 956ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 940ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 758ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 755ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 779ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 855ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 990ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 946ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.2s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5

Is it Vercel, or is it you?

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Vercel -- it cannot diagnose Vercel's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Vercel answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the api row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
  • APIprimaryUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational

Get an email when we see Vercel go down, and when it is back

Get told when we measure this

We will tell you when our probes stop reaching Vercel, and again when they can reach it again. That is our own measurement from ten regions, not Vercel's status page. No account, no card.

Delivery channel

Double opt-in: nothing is sent until you click the link in the confirmation email. One email when a measured outage opens, one when it closes, and a one-click unsubscribe in every one. We do not send anything else to this address.

What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What we measured, and what people reported

  • North America
    OperationalUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Operationallatency: 316msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Operationallatency: 39msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Operationallatency: 366msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Operationallatency: 222msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:59 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Operationallatency: 624msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 7:56 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    OperationalEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Operationallatency: 483msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:13 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Operationallatency: 466msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:02 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    OperationalAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Operationallatency: 662msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:08 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Operationallatency: 712msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:03 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Operationallatency: 776msstatus code: 403checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:03 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Vercel, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for Vercel yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent outages

Build failures and 500 errors for functions using Edge runtime, 27mdeclared on their status page2026-09-28
Deployment stuck in initializing state, 55mdeclared on their status page2026-09-18
Elevated Errors Triggering Deployments, 50mdeclared on their status page2026-09-18
Elevated Vercel KMS and Connect Errors, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-09-18
Failures delivering Logs to Drains, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-09-17
Missing Web Analytics and Speed Insights data, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-09-16
Invoice Generation Paused, 1mdeclared on their status page2026-09-16
Partial outage, under our ~10m probe resolutionmeasured by our probes · US-West2026-09-11

measured entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Vercel since August 8, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Vercel covering any window you pick, with our measurements and Vercel's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full availability history for Vercel: 90-day availability by region, month-by-month uptime, and every incident on record.

Monitor your own site the same way

This page shows what we see when we check this service, using the same ten regions, for a site you run. RealUptime Monitor watches your own servers from inside your network, and it starts free.

Start monitoring your own servers

Put this badge in your README

Vercel uptime measured by RealUptimeLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Vercel uptime measured by RealUptime](https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Vercel uptime measured by RealUptime"></a>

The badge shows the share of our probes that succeeded over the last 30 days, and the window is printed on it so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so: it will not show green on data we cannot vouch for. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

What Vercel's SLA implies, from our measurement

At or above your target

We measured none of downtime for Vercel over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our reading. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

By our measurement there is no shortfall to claim for this period.

Separately, we measured 10 minutes where only one of our regions was affected. It is excluded above because most SLAs would not credit it, and it is the kind of outage a single-vantage monitor never sees at all.

This is computed from our own probe measurements, not from Vercel's SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primaryfunctional: live API
https://api.vercel.com/v2/user
secondary
https://vercel.com/
secondary
https://www.vercel-status.com/
RealUptime is not affiliated with Vercel; the name identifies what we measured, and nothing here speaks for Vercel's own team. We send a single web request to Vercel from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Vercel's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Vercel's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Vercel is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a clean read there is a stronger signal than reachability alone, though it still does not cover every feature of the service. Read the full methodology.