Skip to content

Outage tracker / X (Twitter)

Is X (Twitter) down?

I'm having a problem

Operationalchecked moments ago

We reached X (Twitter) from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 5, 2026, 9:04 PM UTC, X (Twitter) answered RealUptime's probes in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Functional endpoints verified

Last outage: 11 min on Sep 13, 2026 (web surface, from Europe, South America, US-East, US-Central, US-West and Canada).

Email me the next time we see X (Twitter) go down

Measured by our own probes from ten regions, not X (Twitter)'s status page. One email when a measured outage opens and one when it closes, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

our independent probeslive · checked Oct 5, 2026, 9:04 PM UTC
US-East223 msOperational
US-West634 msOperational
Europe241 msOperational
Asia-Pacific434 msOperational
US-Central543 msOperational
Canada1318 msOperational
UK383 msOperational
Southeast Asia539 msOperational
Australia1280 msOperational
South America950 msOperational
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

X (Twitter) publishes no status feed we can read, so the only independent reading here is ours on the left.

X (Twitter) response time, by region

US-East
1.5sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 384ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 326ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 332ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 323ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 337ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 479ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 361ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 348ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 363ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 440ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 426ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 436ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 438ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 335ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 358ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 382ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 406ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 439ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 402ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 456ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 405ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 438ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 473ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.5s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-West
516msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 299ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 274ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 378ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 396ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 324ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 302ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 301ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 261ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 356ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 433ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 916ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 360ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 386ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 407ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 518ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 796ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 415ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 773ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 529ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 879ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 478ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 467ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 418ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 518ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 525ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 502ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 478ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 516ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Europe
1.4sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 352ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 367ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 348ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 361ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 349ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 382ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 372ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 363ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 507ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 364ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 455ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 510ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 472ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 450ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 456ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 469ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 463ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 402ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 395ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 387ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 416ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 370ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 349ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 411ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Asia-Pacific
786msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 954ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 924ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 889ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 937ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 918ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 898ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 873ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 855ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 809ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 865ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 879ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 916ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 880ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 921ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 995ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 982ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 907ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 834ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 816ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 820ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 786ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-Central
1.5sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 526ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 560ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 549ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 564ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 543ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 730ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 816ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 500ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 682ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 583ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 522ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 516ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 505ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 522ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 532ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 460ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 497ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 813ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 763ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 787ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 820ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 581ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 528ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 657ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.5s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Canada
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 602ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 695ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 717ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 792ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 662ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 657ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 672ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 772ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 649ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 744ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 753ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 725ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 680ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 612ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 667ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 631ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 894ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 604ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 693ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 717ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 604ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 627ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 578ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 586ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 673ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
UK
1.3sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 426ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 404ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 438ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 445ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 632ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 537ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 633ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 460ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 561ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 499ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 489ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 493ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 514ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 483ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 768ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 713ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 588ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 631ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 570ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 619ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 576ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 637ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 653ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 596ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 605ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.3s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Southeast Asia
1.0sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 941ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 964ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.0s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Australia
1.4sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
South America
1.7sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 925ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 772ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 915ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 802ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 963ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 946ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 874ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 893ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 811ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 857ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 943ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 818ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 704ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 720ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 773ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 904ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 870ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 811ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 970ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.7s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5

Is it X (Twitter), or is it you?

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not X (Twitter) -- it cannot diagnose X (Twitter)'s own systems.

What we measured, function by function

X (Twitter) answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the web row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebprimaryUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
  • AuthUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What we measured, and what people reported

  • North America
    OperationalUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Operationallatency: 223msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:02 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Operationallatency: 634msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:01 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Operationallatency: 543msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:00 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Operationallatency: 1318msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:02 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Operationallatency: 950msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:59 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    OperationalEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Operationallatency: 241msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:03 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Operationallatency: 383msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:03 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    OperationalAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Operationallatency: 434msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:04 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Operationallatency: 539msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:03 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Operationallatency: 1280msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 9:01 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach X (Twitter) normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using X (Twitter), counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for X (Twitter) yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent outages

Outage, 11mmeasured by our probes · Europe and South America and US-East and US-Central and US-West and Canada2026-09-13
Partial outage, 4mmeasured by our probes · South America2026-09-06
Partial outage, under our ~2m probe resolutionmeasured by our probes · US-East2026-09-05

measured entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring X (Twitter) since August 20, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for X (Twitter) covering any window you pick, with our measurements and X (Twitter)'s own claim at the time, side by side.

Full availability history for X (Twitter): 90-day availability by region, month-by-month uptime, and every incident on record.

Put this badge in your README

X (Twitter) uptime measured by RealUptimeLive, from this page's own readings.
[![X (Twitter) uptime measured by RealUptime](https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/x-twitter/badge.svg?days=30" alt="X (Twitter) uptime measured by RealUptime"></a>

The badge shows the share of our probes that succeeded over the last 30 days, and the window is printed on it so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so: it will not show green on data we cannot vouch for. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

What X (Twitter)'s SLA implies, from our measurement

At or above your target

We measured 10 minutes of downtime for X (Twitter) over the last 30 days, which is 99.9747% uptime by our reading. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

By our measurement there is no shortfall to claim for this period.

Separately, we measured 3 minutes where only one of our regions was affected. It is excluded above because most SLAs would not credit it, and it is the kind of outage a single-vantage monitor never sees at all.

This is computed from our own probe measurements, not from X (Twitter)'s SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

secondaryfunctional: auth surface
https://api.x.com/2/tweets/20
primary
https://x.com/
RealUptime is not affiliated with X (Twitter); the name identifies what we measured, and nothing here speaks for X (Twitter)'s own team. We send a single web request to X (Twitter) from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside X (Twitter)'s systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal X (Twitter)'s own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for X (Twitter) is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a clean read there is a stronger signal than reachability alone, though it still does not cover every feature of the service. Read the full methodology.