Skip to content

Outage tracker / Battle.net (Blizzard)

Is Battle.net (Blizzard) down?

I'm having a problem

Operationalchecked 1 minute ago

We reached Battle.net (Blizzard) from all 10 regions we check.

As of Oct 5, 2026, 8:16 PM UTC, Battle.net (Blizzard) answered RealUptime's probes in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Functional endpoints verified

No outage recorded in the 46 days we have measured Battle.net (Blizzard) (since Aug 20, 2026).

Email me the next time we see Battle.net (Blizzard) go down

Measured by our own probes from ten regions, not Battle.net (Blizzard)'s status page. One email when a measured outage opens and one when it closes, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

our independent probeslive · checked Oct 5, 2026, 8:16 PM UTC
US-East1136 msOperational
US-West722 msOperational
Europe278 msOperational
Asia-Pacific934 msOperational
US-Central263 msOperational
Canada840 msOperational
UK449 msOperational
Southeast Asia909 msOperational
Australia1601 msOperational
South America1120 msOperational
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Battle.net (Blizzard) publishes no status feed we can read, so the only independent reading here is ours on the left.

Battle.net (Blizzard) response time, by region

US-East
1.5sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.5s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-West
926msp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 665ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 476ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 555ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 454ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 449ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 390ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 499ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 592ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 426ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 799ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 816ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 839ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 752ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 853ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 835ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 813ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 875ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 800ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 579ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 669ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 606ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 597ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 588ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 572ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 767ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 990ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 961ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 926ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Europe
1.0sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 261ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 195ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 197ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 236ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 204ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 284ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 354ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 256ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 695ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 465ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 270ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 215ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 210ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 271ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 191ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 232ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 296ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 255ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 380ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 418ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 351ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 309ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 392ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 521ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 804ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.0s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Asia-Pacific
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 750ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 692ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 914ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 972ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 922ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 953ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 908ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 903ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 961ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 924ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 885ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 970ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
US-Central
616msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 517ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 600ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 698ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 734ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 620ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 583ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 588ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 649ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 575ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 639ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 583ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 591ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 517ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 598ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 577ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 580ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 575ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 798ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 694ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 528ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 505ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 493ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 514ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 484ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 911ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 760ms2026-10-02 UTC: p95 670ms2026-10-03 UTC: p95 624ms2026-10-04 UTC: p95 697ms2026-10-05 UTC: p95 616ms
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Canada
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 715ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 695ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 650ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 735ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 800ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 727ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 755ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 773ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 750ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 733ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 722ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 641ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 678ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 628ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 619ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 734ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 733ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 768ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 964ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
UK
1.1sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 321ms2026-09-07 UTC: p95 459ms2026-09-08 UTC: p95 481ms2026-09-09 UTC: p95 431ms2026-09-10 UTC: p95 608ms2026-09-11 UTC: p95 506ms2026-09-12 UTC: p95 430ms2026-09-13 UTC: p95 366ms2026-09-14 UTC: p95 375ms2026-09-15 UTC: p95 366ms2026-09-16 UTC: p95 463ms2026-09-17 UTC: p95 486ms2026-09-18 UTC: p95 366ms2026-09-19 UTC: p95 420ms2026-09-20 UTC: p95 428ms2026-09-21 UTC: p95 423ms2026-09-22 UTC: p95 460ms2026-09-23 UTC: p95 584ms2026-09-24 UTC: p95 623ms2026-09-25 UTC: p95 589ms2026-09-26 UTC: p95 489ms2026-09-27 UTC: p95 551ms2026-09-28 UTC: p95 596ms2026-09-29 UTC: p95 486ms2026-09-30 UTC: p95 715ms2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.1s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Southeast Asia
1.4sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 2s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
Australia
2.2sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 2.2s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5
South America
1.4sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-09-06 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-07 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-08 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-09-09 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-10 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-11 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-13 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-14 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-15 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-16 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-17 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-09-18 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-09-19 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-21 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-22 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-09-23 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-24 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-09-25 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-26 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-09-27 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-09-28 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-09-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-09-30 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-02 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-03 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-05 UTC: p95 1.4s
Sep 6Sep 20Oct 5

Is it Battle.net (Blizzard), or is it you?

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Battle.net (Blizzard) -- it cannot diagnose Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Battle.net (Blizzard) answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the auth row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
  • AuthprimaryUS-East: OperationalUS-West: OperationalEurope: OperationalAsia-Pacific: OperationalUS-Central: OperationalCanada: OperationalUK: OperationalSoutheast Asia: OperationalAustralia: OperationalSouth America: Operational
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What we measured, and what people reported

  • North America
    OperationalUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Operationallatency: 1136msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:09 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Operationallatency: 722msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:08 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Operationallatency: 263msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Operationallatency: 840msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:10 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Operationallatency: 1120msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:16 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    OperationalEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Operationallatency: 278msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:09 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Operationallatency: 449msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:07 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    OperationalAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Operationallatency: 934msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Operationallatency: 909msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Operationallatency: 1601msstatus code: 200checked: Oct 5, 2026, 8:08 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Battle.net (Blizzard) normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Battle.net (Blizzard), counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for Battle.net (Blizzard) yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent outages

No outages on record yet for Battle.net (Blizzard).

measured entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Battle.net (Blizzard) since August 20, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Battle.net (Blizzard) covering any window you pick, with our measurements and Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own claim at the time, side by side.

Full availability history for Battle.net (Blizzard): 90-day availability by region, month-by-month uptime, and every incident on record.

Put this badge in your README

Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime measured by RealUptimeLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime measured by RealUptime](https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/battle-net/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Battle.net (Blizzard) uptime measured by RealUptime"></a>

The badge shows the share of our probes that succeeded over the last 30 days, and the window is printed on it so the number always says what period it covers. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so: it will not show green on data we cannot vouch for. Free, no account, and it links back here. See how the badge works for every window and the honesty rules behind it.

What Battle.net (Blizzard)'s SLA implies, from our measurement

At or above your target

We measured none of downtime for Battle.net (Blizzard) over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our reading. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

By our measurement there is no shortfall to claim for this period.

This is computed from our own probe measurements, not from Battle.net (Blizzard)'s SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primaryfunctional: auth surface
https://oauth.battle.net/.well-known/openid-configuration
secondary
https://www.blizzard.com/
RealUptime is not affiliated with Battle.net (Blizzard); the name identifies what we measured, and nothing here speaks for Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own team. We send a single web request to Battle.net (Blizzard) from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Battle.net (Blizzard)'s systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Battle.net (Blizzard)'s own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Battle.net (Blizzard) is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a clean read there is a stronger signal than reachability alone, though it still does not cover every feature of the service. Read the full methodology.